August 16, 2015
It was an ominous moment in Australian Internet culture when Australian Telecommunications Minister Stephen Conroy announced in 2007 that there would be Internet censorship in Australia. There was little in the way of placation when he said that it wouldn’t be like in China:
“Labor makes no apologies to those that argue that any regulation of the internet is like going down the Chinese road.”
Because, well, because he said so is all the evidence we’re given that the country with the most restrictive Internet policies in the Westernized world won’t worsen. That, for me and many others, wasn’t good enough. And us doubters have been shown to be right; Internet censorship in Australia has continued to worsen since this statement was made.
When it started to get really dicey
Look at a move back in 2014 with proposed legislation that would give more powers to a government regulatory body to say what they want taken offline – all in the name of ‘protecting children.’
To quote a group regulatory body, that includes Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Twitter that are already working on this issue, and which know quite a bit more about how it will work;
“the creation of a new statutory body and new regulation on complaints handling seems at odds with the government’s stated strategy to reduce regulation and to streamline government agencies.”
The move made many feel as if:
- A single appointed person in government could decide what should and shouldn’t be online
- This power could be abused for political motives
The more power going to one set of hands, the more likely it is that those hands will abuse that power. I’m sure we all know the saying for absolute power on that one.
Who is fighting back against Internet Censorship in Australia
The main group of privacy activists in Australia are the EFA – Electronic Frontiers Australia. This group has been around since 1994, back when you thought everything online was free, and they have fought tirelessly to keep government censorship of the Australian Internet in check since that time.
The group states their Objectives as being:
- To protect and promote the civil liberties of users of computer based communications systems and of those affected by their use.
- To advocate the amendment of laws and regulations in Australia and elsewhere which restrict free speech and unfettered access to information.
- To educate the community at large about the social, political, and civil liberties issues involved in the use of computer based communications systems.
- To support, encourage and advise on the development and use of computer based communication systems, and related innovations.
- To research and advise on the application of the law (both current and proposed) to computer based communication systems and related technologies.
They had a great recent campaign called ‘Citizens, Not Suspects’ that is against mandatory data retention laws. Their aim was to lessen government surveillance of ordinary citizens in the hopes of finding criminals amongst them. Like phone-tapping everyone to listen to one criminal. The campaign was connected to the larger, #StopDataRetention campaign, largely supported by Senator Scott Ludlam:
— Scott Ludlam (@SenatorLudlam) March 17, 2015
While it was unsuccessful, it did lots to promote Internet privacy issues amongst the general Aussie population.
Is Internet censorship in Australia that big a deal?
The state of the Internet in Australia isn’t as bad as China or North Korea where netizens can’t access most of the sites you use everyday. Australia has, however, flirted with Reporters Without Borders ‘Enemies of the Internet List’ as an ‘under surveillance’ country for their laws which relate to the repression of information.
Take a look at Reporters Without Borders current map of countries that are Enemies of the Internet:
It would be pretty fair of me to say that some of those countries are not the friendliest. It would also be fair to say that a few of them are downright criminal in how they treat their people. Let’s hope that Australia continues to not only stay off this list, but move further away from being on it as they seek to give their netizens greater access to the Internet – not less.
Image Credit: Flickr/Brian J. Matis
Did you like this article?
Get more delivered to your inbox just like it!