What YouTube’s 10,000 Content Gatekeepers Mean for the Future

One major battle has emerged on the biggest social media platforms over the past few years: Just how much of a social network can be auto-moderated, and how much must depend on the (more cost-intensive) human touch? Naturally, tech bros and gurus everywhere staunchly believed that any current discrepancies could be solved with the right tweak to their algorithms.

Now, a different narrative is emerging: Perhaps the naysayers have a point. YouTube is just the latest major network to buckle, with news breaking today that they aim to grow their content moderating team to 10,000 hires within the next 12 months.

Why YouTube Needs Moderators

The report, out from Buzzfeed, cites a Monday blog post from YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki as well as “sources familiar with YouTube’s workforce numbers” who say the 10,000 number will be about a 25 percent increase from the number of content moderators in operation currently.

The move follows media reports that the company has failed to adequately remove video featuring children in upsetting and abusive situations. Some of these videos can still be found, Buzzfeed notes.

The company’s response — to hire thousands of additional moderators — isn’t the first time a massive social platform has turned to human hires in the face of an algorithm-created PR crisis. Facebook made the same decision last year following a number of deaths filmed live through their platform. Here’s how I summed it up at the time:

“Remember Facebook’s “Trending News” controversy last year? Back then, they got in trouble for displaying news blurbs as if they were automatically generated, but quietly using human editors. Then, they switched to an algorithmran several fake news stories in Trending, and got in trouble for that. Facebook just can’t win. And as with their Trending News problems, Facebook’s actions in hiring 3,000 editors indicates that they realize their algorithms just can’t handle all their problems.”

Now YouTube’s move to do the same indicates that this isn’t just a one-time problem. Across the board, algorithmic sorting isn’t up to the task of flagging and removing abusive or disreputable content.

Reactions Are Mixed

A variety of opinionated internet commentators looked at a variety of different takeaways. One pointed out that these hires will bring YouTube’s moderating staff up to “3 entire Twitter staffs,” contrasting this against Twitter’s own content curator failures. Another pointed out that 10,000 moderators are still too few to handle YouTube’s content firehose of “400 hours of video uploaded every minute.”

Can algorithms continue improving enough to eventually handle the problem? It might not seem likely, but one thing’s for sure: If they don’t, it won’t be for lack of trying.

Did you find this article helpful? Click on one of the following buttons
We're so happy you liked! Get more delivered to your inbox just like it.

We're sorry this article didn't help you today – we welcome feedback, so if there's any way you feel we could improve our content, please email us at contact@tech.co

Written by:
Adam is a writer at Tech.co and has worked as a tech writer, blogger and copy editor for more than a decade. He was a Forbes Contributor on the publishing industry, for which he was named a Digital Book World 2018 award finalist. His work has appeared in publications including Popular Mechanics and IDG Connect, and his art history book on 1970s sci-fi, 'Worlds Beyond Time,' is out from Abrams Books in July 2023. In the meantime, he's hunting down the latest news on VPNs, POS systems, and the future of tech.
Explore More See all news
Back to top
close Building a Website? We've tested and rated Wix as the best website builder you can choose – try it yourself for free Try Wix today