It's no surprise you want to improve fuel economy. The US trucking industry spends an estimated $105 billion on diesel fuel annually, representing the second biggest expense motor carriers face, after labor costs. That's as much as 20% of total operating costs!
Saving on fuel is essential for every driver or fleet manager looking to cut costs, particularly during a global pandemic, where every dollar counts.
We've combined industry insider tips and scientific research to offer the most comprehensive investigation of which habits burn the most fuel, and how fleets can save as much money as possible.
And these tips work. In fact, according to research, managers that follow these tips can save up to 30% on fuel costs and increase from an average 6MPG to ~8.5MPG per vehicle.
Take a look below – and if you're serious about improving your fleet management business, consider getting a quote for fleet management software with built-in fuel-saving features.
10 Ways to Get Better Gas Mileage in a Truck
Below, we've listed all the different factors that you can influence in order to improve fuel economy in a truck. Some changes offer a far greater impact than others, so we've ranked these changes in order of importance, putting the biggest difference-makers first.
More than any other driving habit, excessive speeding burns the most fuel.
A truck driving 75 mph consumes 27% more fuel than one driving 65 mph, the ATA has found. According to their estimate, capping truck speed at 65 mph would net the trucking industry another 2.8 billion gallons of diesel fuel saved, over the course of a decade.
Speeding can be easily avoided, too, by simply paying attention to the speedometer. If you're concerned that drivers won't follow the set speed limits while driving, you can monitor vehicle speeds with a GPS-equipped fleet management system (FMS).
For those that speed to save time, you may be shocked to learn how little difference it makes. Over a distance of 100 miles, a vehicle will only save a maximum of 12 minutes by going at 75 mph instead of 65 mph. It's simply not worth the extra cost, or risk.
The next biggest area to focus on after speeding? Harsh and frequent braking and accelerating. Think about the stop-start driving that vehicles suffer through when an overeager trucker speeds up, only to slow back down immediately, on busy roads.
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory has one of the best sources of data for this issue, although it comes with a few caveats. Its researchers published a 2017 study that found fuel economy in light-duty gasoline vehicles could be improved by between 15% and 30% when at highway speeds, simply by curbing aggressive driving. The US Department of Energy used that same study as a jumping-off point to estimate that dollar savings could be between $0.26 and $1.06 per gallon of gasoline used.
However, a heavy-duty truck won't see the exact results that a light-duty vehicle would, and it's unrealistic to assume all harsh driving habits can be stopped. A 2012 study that factored in what it called “real-world driving conditions” landed on a more conservative estimate of 5–10% reduced fuel use through ceasing to brake and accelerate harshly, or 20% less fuel use for particularly aggressive cases. One takeaway is clear: aggressive driving is one of the biggest fuel burning practices out there.
Idling a heavy-duty truck burns around 0.8 gallons of fuel each hour. That's higher than the 0.25 to 0.5 gallons that a consumer car burns, since the larger engine size consumes more. Idling adds up fast, particularly when truckers idle at rest stops for hours on end — indeed, according to one estimate, rest stop idling burns 1.1 billion gallons of fuel every year.
Idling also increases total emissions, as well as engine wear — leading to extra maintenance costs down the line.
Cutting down on idling is perhaps best implemented through a company-wide policy change. This can be enforced through an FMS that logs idle times, which can notify fleet managers when idling exceeds a set limit.
Another option is an Automatic Engine Start/Stop (AESS) system, which automatically starts and stops the engine in an effort to keep the cab temperatures reasonable while reducing idle times. These systems are fairly inexpensive to install, but also only “offer minimal savings in extreme weather,” according to one 2015 report from the AFDC — so may not be worth the trouble.
If your vehicle is out of tune or has failed an emissions test, getting the engine tuned up might boost your fuel economy. However, this fuel-saving measure doesn't have the most recent data to back it up. According to the best study out there, from Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc., engine repairs could lead to a “net expected value” improvement of 4.1% better fuel economy.
The catch? That study is from way back in 2001, so it may not apply to trucks on the road nearly two decades later – many of which have a higher overall fuel economy. That didn't stop the US Department of Energy from re-using this statistic without citation in one 2019 guide, but hey, I'm not here to point fingers.
This tip is largely just common sense, however: a vehicle that's in bad condition needs to be better maintained if you want it to keep running at an optimal level. The fact that it'll result in better fuel economy is just one of the benefits. Change your oil frequently, and don't forget about changing the fuel filters — one task that's commonly overlooked when it comes to diesel trucks.
When a truck's tires are under-inflated, they don't do their job as well, and the vehicle burns more gas to compensate. How much more? According to a 2006 report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, you can expect a drop of 0.2% in gas mileage for every 1 psi lower than the recommended pressure.
If your tires averaged 10 psi too low before you topped them off, you'll tighten your fuel use by 2% when your tires are properly inflated. That might not sound like a lot, but keeping your tires inflated is an easy fix, and it'll add up over time. Another 2001 survey from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of one fleet found that one third of all vehicles had at least one tire “severely under-inflated,” so poor tire inflation might be a bigger problem than you'd think.
If under-inflated tires will lose you gas, do over-inflated tires save even more gas? Not according to one myth-busting experiment by Popular Mechanics, which found virtually no difference in MPG even over a 400-mile trip. Granted, Pop Mech used a Honda Fit rather than any type of truck, but you're unlikely to see better results with your own rig.
Dan Lewis, CEO of digital freight matching company Convoy, thinks inefficiency is the biggest problem facing truckers today.
“Trucks are running down the highway empty, then they’re sitting for hours at facilities,” he said in a 2018 CNBC interview. “You can generate 20–30% more capacity just by running the whole system more efficiently.”
This is a particularly useful tip for the many local delivery trucks with multiple stops to reach before they return to their base of operations. What's the most efficient path to take? Which route will have the least traffic at which time of day? That can be a lot of moving parts to keep tabs on, which is why inefficiencies tend to creep in.
I'd strongly recommend looking into a routing and dispatch software that can automate key decisions based on real driving data, and plot out the best route in seconds. Most FMSs offer this service, and it's a simple way to save on daily fuel costs.
The fuel used by blasting a vehicle's air conditioning has been well studied in cars, though the literature is sparse for trucks. Consumer Reports has the definitive test for Honda Accords: they drove one at 65 mph while running the A/C, and determined that the air conditioner cut into fuel mileage by 3%. Interestingly, they also tried running the Honda at 65 mph with the windows rolled down, and found the effect on fuel usage was “not measurable.”
Past estimates for the impact of A/C on fuel use have ranged wildly, reaching as much as 30%, according to the SAE. While the exact fuel impact for trucks isn't quite clear, it definitely exists, and 3% is likely the floor for a truck's air conditioner's impact on fuel economy. Limiting it will save fuel.
Granted, this measure may simply not be worth the driver suffering through sweltering heat, even if they can open the windows or opt for a portable 12V-battery-powered air conditioning unit. Drivers will do a lot for improved fuel savings, but ditching their A/C might be a bridge too far. In fact, UPS is under scrutiny for not even offering A/C in their delivery trucks, despite 110 degree heat in some regions.
A full truckload burns more fuel than an empty truck. One Canadian report estimates that a truck that reduces its weight by 110 pounds would save $490 in fuel across 124,274 miles.
Perhaps more importantly, you'll also want to avoid strapping anything to a truck bed that could add wind resistance. According to Consumer Reports, even an empty rack will drop a car's mileage by 5 mph when driving at 65 mph.
Now, I'm not suggesting you start shipping empty trailers. Naturally, you'll still want to get your trucks as full of their actual freight as possible. US trucks moved 10.8 billion tons of freight in 2017 alone, and all of that weight was necessary. But everything else that isn't needed is technically costing you fuel. If you can trim another 20 pounds off your total weight here and there, it'll (slowly) add up.
Will running a fuel-powered heating system for a truck burn enough fuel to put a dent in your bottom line? Not really. But you can try, if you must.
A 2015 study by the AFDC found that heavy-duty trucks burned between 0.04 and 0.08 gallons per hour in order to operate a diesel-fired heater. That's not nothing, but keeping your truck cab toasty during a cold winter night isn't nothing, either. It's a small fuel expenditure, but it has a big impact on a trucker's quality of life.
Limiting drivers' heat is likely to be pretty far down on a fleet manager's list of priorities for how to get better gas mileage in a truck. And after all, it is at the bottom of this list.
Truly, one of the best ways to implement all these changes is with fleet management software. This robust business tool is designed to cut down on costs, improve productivity, and generally make your business more efficient from top to bottom.
Fleet Management software can help you implement all of the tips above. It can automate alerts which reduce bad habits such as speeding and idling. It can optimize routes accounting for multiple destinations, traffic and the weather, in real time. It can let you know when there's an engine issue or need for maintenance. Plus, it can offer your business additional benefits, including managing dispatch, ELD compliance, IFTA tax, and much more.
For a glance at what kind of providers are out there, take a look at this table to see all the fuel-saving features and prices of some of the best.
The typical lowest starting price. The lowest price available for your business will depend on your needs.
Who is this provider most suitable for?
Free Trial or Demo
Fuel card integration
US Fleet Tracking
Contact for custom quote
Pricing not available
Best for the transportation industry
Best for data-hungry companies
Best for location tracking only
Best low cost option
Ease of use, thanks a great interface and support team
Companies needing flexibility
Best for reliability
Best mid-range option
Free online demo, free tailored price quote
30-day free trial; hardware and software
Free online demo
Free live demo
14-day free trial
Free online demo
Demo version available
Total Gas Costs Saved With Fleet Management
If you want to start implementing all these fuel-saving measures today, a fleet management system is your fastest path to that goal. An FMS will be able to address the three biggest fuel-wasting practices: speeding, harsh braking or accelerating, and excessive idle times. Fleet managers can set automatic notifications to be sent by email or SMS to let them know of any incidents, and can read weekly or monthly reports that let them know whether drivers' habits are improving over time. Many fleet management systems make it easy to see and reward the best drivers, through driver scorecards.
Need your fleet to be ELD compliant? Check out our ELD devices guide
Granted, an FMS won't solve every problem on the list — it won't directly impact A/C use, or get rid of unneeded weight — but it's certainly the most simple way to address the biggest concerns.
In the end, an FMS will let you go much further on each gallon of fuel purchased.
But just how much can an FMS help you reduce fuel use and costs? According to major vendor Verizon Connect Reveal, you can reduce fuel costs by up to 20–25% with their vehicle tracking solution. Another top vendor, Samsara, estimates their FMS offers fuel savings of $1,193 per vehicle per year. Finally, Teletrac Navman conducted a customer survey that indicates their FMS reduces average fuel use by up to 30%.
According to Automotive Fleet, the US has 20,000 fleets of 15 or more vehicles. Assuming the average fleet of class 8 trucks clocks in at 20 vehicles, saving 30% on each vehicle's fuel economy gives that fleet a total annual savings of just under $165,000. A 50-vehicle fleet can save around $412,400 per year with an FMS — which is also how much the fleet will waste for every year that it doesn't upgrade.
Granted, most fleets aren't entirely class 8 trucks. Thanks to a little government data on the average fuel use of eight different vehicle types in 2018, combined with a national average gas price of $2.56 per gallon, I was able to put together this table showing just how much a 30% saving in fuel economy would mean for each vehicle type.
Class 8 Truck
Annual average fuel cost
Estimated annual fuel waste
New cost (with 30% FMS savings)
Total Increase in MPG for a Truck
All those dollar numbers on the table above are pretty big when you're looking at an entire year of savings. But how much exactly will you be saving on the more practical miles-per-gallon metric?
To figure that out, we'll need to know how many miles to the gallon the average truck makes. According to data on class 7 and class 8 trucks collected by Geotab, the average MPG varies varies from state to state, but tends to fall pretty close to 6 MPG across the continental US. Assuming gasoline averages $2.56/gallon, that means fuel savings of 30% would turn a $2.56 6-mile trip into a $1.792 6-mile trip. That's $0.299 per mile at the reduced price.
$2.56, divided by $0.299, comes out to 8.562. In other words, if a fleet fully benefits from an FMS, it could jump up from 6 miles per gallon to 8.56 miles per gallon. (If you didn't follow that math, you'll just have to trust us!)
If you operate a class 8 truck, follow the advice in this article, and get a fleet management system, you'll save fuel costs by up to 30%, and go as far as 2.56 miles more per gallon — an uplift of 42.67%.
How to Improve Fuel Economy Today
The trucking industry spends billions on fuel every year, and it represents a huge opportunity for even the smallest fleets to save money. With fleet management software, you'll be able to notably cut into your fuel costs, as well as improve routing, comply with safety regulations, and follow all the legal guidelines for trucking.
If you're ready to commit to saving fuel today, fleet management software is the best way to increase your miles per gallon. To get started, take a look at our quick price comparison form. It just takes a minute to fill out, and will get you personalized quotes from all the top fleet management software providers in the industry.
Tech.co is reader-supported. Using Tech.co's comparison form, you can receive quotes from various suppliers, tailored to the needs of your business. If you enter into a contract with a provider, we may receive a payment for the introduction. Equally, if you make a purchase through the links on our site, we may earn a commission from the retailers of the products we have reviewed. This helps Tech.co to provide free advice and reviews. It carries no additional cost to you, and doesn’t affect our editorial independence.