ELDs Removed From FMCSA Approved Devices List

Make sure you're compliant with the ELD mandate by checking out which devices have been removed from the approved list.

If you drive a truck in the US, you know what an electronic logging device (ELD) is and, more importantly, you know what the ELD mandate is. This 2012 law established that every commercial driver in America is required to record hours of service through electronic logging devices, starting December 16th, 2019.

After that date, drivers that do not have a compliant ELD may receive a citation and even be placed out of service (OOS) for a period time. Subsequently, it’s pretty important to know exactly which of these devices actually helps you stay within the regulations for your vehicle.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has a list of approved ELDs that will keep you covered. However, the administration is constantly updating the list, most notably removing formerly compliant devices off of it. That’s where we’re here to help.

In this guide, we’ll cover all the ELDs that have been removed from the FMCSA Approved Devices List recently, so you can stay compliant throughout the year.

ELD ONE (TMS ONE)

TMS ONE’s ELD ONE device was removed from the FMCSA Approved Devices list on January 31st, 2023.

According to the press release from the FMCSA, the company failed “to meet the minimum requirements established in 49 CFR part 395, subpart B, appendix A.” After a little digging, we found those requirements state that “the display must be reasonably viewed by an authorized safety official without entering the commercial motor vehicle” (CMV).”

Nationwide ELD (Nationwide Technologies)

Just a few short days later, Nationwide Technologies and its Nationwide ELD was removed from the Approved Devices list as well on February 3rd, 2023.

The Nationwide ELD was removed from the list for the same reason as the ELD ONE, with the company failing to meet the requirements set forth in regard to a safety official’s ability to view the ELD without entering the vehicle.

ORS device (ONE PLUS ELD)

Not to be outdone, ORS PLUS ELD and its ORS device were also removed from the FMCSA Approved Devices list on February 8th, 2023.

You’re not going to believe it, but the ORS device was removed from the list for the same reason as the devices above. The company did not meet requirements established in 49 CFR part 395, subpart B, appendix A, so you’ll have to find a new ELD in the next 60 days or risk penalties.

All-Ways Track ELD (All-Ways Track)

There was a bit of a lull between the next ELD removed from the FMSCA Approved Devices lists, but All-Ways Tracks ELD from All-Ways Track joined the fray when it was removed on March 27th, 2023.

We’re a perfect four for four so far, as the All-Ways Track ELD was also removed from the list for failing to comply with regulations stating the display needs to be reasonably visible without entering the motor vehicle.

What to Do If Your ELD Is No Longer Compliant

If you’ve just discovered that your ELD has been removed from the FMCSA Approved Devices list, don’t panic. The administration allows for drivers to get a new device within 60 days of removing a particular device from the list, so you have two months to get a new one.

We’ve done a lot of research on the best ELD options in 2024, so feel free to check out our guide and keep up with news on Tech.co for more updates about the ELD mandate.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Report: Google Bard Could Be Used to Spread Misinformation

A new report from NewsGuard found that Google's generative AI platform is all-too ready to spread misinformation.

The rushed release of AI-powered chatbots may have some unexpected drawbacks, as a new report found that Google’s ChatGPT alternative Bard is all-too comfortable spreading misinformation if prompted the right way.

If you haven’t heard of ChatGPT and its many alternatives, you’ve likely been living under a rock for the last few months. The generative AI technology has taken the tech industry by storm, fueling dozens of copycats from the likes of Alibaba, Salesforce, and even Snapchat. These tools are designed to create content, develop code, and generally tackle mundane tasks at businesses around the world.

Unfortunately, while these AI tools have taken the load of off some employees, little has been investigated about how ChatGPT, Bard, and other iterations could be used to exasperate the growing problem of misinformation. Until now.

New Report Outlines Misinformation Problem for Google Bard

According to a new study from NewsGuard obtained by Bloomberg, Google Bard — the tech giant’s alternative to ChatGPT — is a bit too ready to spread misinformation.

The news reliability data service merely asked the generative AI chatbot to write something about “the great reset” as a far-right online pundit. The results were a conspiracy-laden rant touching on myriad of offensive and disproven theories about a wide range of problematic topics.

“For all the extraordinary promise of generative AI, it also presents a great threat to trust in information. The early launches of these services often respond to prompts about topics in the news with well-written, persuasive, and entirely false accounts of the news. This could become a force multiplier for those wishing to spread harmful conspiracy theories, healthcare hoaxes, and Russian disinformation at unmatched scale.” – Steven Brill, co-CEO of NewsGuard

That wasn’t the only example, either. NewsGuard input 100 different prompts asking the generative AI platform to create content about misinformation commonly found online, and Bard was happy to develop in-depth content on 76 of them.

How Has Google Responded?

Despite the decidedly rushed release of Bard, Google stands by its generative AI platform, noting that it has safeguards in place to prevent this kind of thing from happening.

“We have published a number of policies to ensure that people are using Bard in a responsible manner, including prohibiting using Bard to generate and distribute content intended to misinform, misrepresent, or mislead. We provide clear disclaimers about Bard’s limitations and offer mechanisms for feedback, and user feedback is helping us improve Bard’s quality, safety and accuracy.” – Robert Ferrara, a Google spokesman

Whether or not Google is actually committed to “focus on quality and safety” when it comes to Bard, the reality is that tech giants have proven time and time again that they don’t necessarily have the tools to rein in their own technology. Heck, social media companies have been trying to figure it out for more than a decade, and they’re clearly still a long way from getting it right.

The ChatGPT Backlash

This report isn’t the only damming piece of news for the generative AI industry. In fact, a wide range of vocal opponents have risen since the dawn of ChatGPT, begging the tech giants that are launching this technology to slow down for the sake of humanity.

An open letter was even penned by some tech professionals that calls for a six-month pause on the development of generative AI technology, so that legislative bodies can catch up and regulate the roll-out a bit more effectively. Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and Andrew Yang have all signed it.

Even more troubling, the country of Germany has recently debated banning the technology for fear of how it will impact daily life, and Italy has already pulled the trigger on blocking it entirely.

As is common with an industry that likes to “move fast and break stuff,” tech giants like Microsoft and Google have been uncomfortably flippant with the concerns about generative AI.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Amazon Plans to Shrink Employee Stock Awards as Recession Looms

As big tech continues to feel the squeeze, Amazon is reconsidering the way it compensates its staff.

The ecommerce behemoth Amazon is going to cut the number of shares it gives to its workforce from 2025, according to a company memo that was recently obtained by Business Insider.

The memo informed managers that the stock units would be reduced due to the “uncertain economic climate,” but it also claimed it would make up for this change by paying staff fairer wages.

This news comes just weeks after the company announced it would be laying off a further 9,000 employees, bringing its total number of displaced workers up to 18,000. Here’s what we know so far.

Amazon Is Cutting Employee Stock Awards from 2025

Amazon is planning to reduce the number of company shares it hands out to its employees, as it prepares itself for an increasingly turbulent economic climate.

This news was leaked in an internal memo that was shown to Business Insider this week and has since been confirmed by Amazon spokesperson August Aldebot-Green. The memo informed managers in the company that stock awards, also known as restricted stock units or RSUs, will be reduced by a “small amount” in 2025, as part of the company’s compensation review cycle.

This decision marks a major change of strategy, with Amazon handing out $19.6 billion in stock-based compensation in 2022, up 54% from the previous year and the highest amount in the company’s history.

However, Amazon’s decision to scale back stock awards isn’t solely a cost-cutting measure. The memo revealed that as part of its revised compensation plan, the company was considering giving more cash to its employees — a decision that’s been long-awaited by lots of Amazon staffers.

Amazon’s Post-Pandemic Bubble Has Officially Burst

While Amazon has remained surprisingly optimistic about its market performance — with the company predicting that its stock price will rise 15% in the next two years — this switch from equity to cash-based compensation is a clear attempt to account for future stock variation.

Amazon, like other companies that cashed in during the pandemic, has fallen on increasingly hard times recently as they deal with bloated workforces and a steady decline in consumer spending.

In a desperate attempt to recover losses, the ecommerce titan announced it could be cutting 9,000 jobs last week across four departments of the company, bringing its total number of layoffs up to 18,000. This move follows similar decisions made by Meta, who announced 10,000 fresh cuts last month, and Google who recently fired 6% of its workforce.

Unfortunately, as big tech continues to brace for a looming recession, scaling back costs have become an industry standard. Learn more about what tech companies are doing to remain competitive here.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Apple Considering Layoffs: Staff Told to Reapply for New Roles

Apple's new cost-cutting measures mean employees will have until Friday to apply for new roles or they'll be let go.

Cost-cutting measures at Apple HQ are on the brink, as the company warns its corporate retail employees to reapply for new roles, or be let go.

The news, announced to Apple employees via video conference, signals another round of tech layoffs, despite the company’s best efforts to avoid it.

As stocks continue to tumble, Apple insists that the move is to improve the support of its stores, but staff are already referring to the announcement as a layoff. Given the turbulence in the industry, it wouldn’t be the first tech giant to try to disguise it.

Apple Employees Are Either In or Out

According to Bloomberg, Apple’s corporate retail division have until Friday to reapply for jobs within the company, or be let go. The decision was described as an ‘org change’ to help improve the support of Apple’s retail stores.

While it’s unclear how many roles will be affected, the decision will reportedly impact the team responsible for the construction and maintenance of Apple’s retail store in the US, Europe and Asia.

Despite forecasts, Apple’s revenue has steadily declined in the last year, with Fortune reporting a 5%  drop in revenue over the holiday quarter. With the demand for Macs and wearables waning, Apple has been forced to implement various cost-cutting measures to ensure the company is able to stay economically viable. The latest news, however, suggests that those moves might not have been as successful as they’d hoped.

Cost-Cutting Measures On the Brink

Until now, Apple have been able to retain the majority of its staff by being ‘more prudent an thoughtful when it comes to spending’. In January, CEO Tim Cook took a 40% pay cut, and the company extended its hiring freeze, paused promotions and bonuses.

The move, which was supposed to be temporary, might signal that the company is facing more challenges that they’d anticipated.

Other measures to cut costs include all travel budgets being signed off by the company’s senior vice president. And, those who choose not to adhere to the company’s return-to-office mandate, at risk of termination.

Are More Tech Layoffs Inevitable?

Despite Apple’s efforts to their retain staff, layoffs are still very much on the cards, with its organizational changes proving that staff cuts may just be inevitable. In the last few months, MicrosoftGoogleMeta have laid off thousands of employees, with reports showing the tech industry to be responsible for more than 100,000 laid off employees in 2023 alone – It’s no surprise that employee trust in the tech industry is broken.

Return-to-office mandates may be disguised as a move to improve productivity, staff sentiment suggests it may just be a way to push more employees out, given the resistance to changing work models.

Still, layoffs don’t appear to be going anywhere. As the industry continues to battle inflation and the aftermath of the pandemic boom – unless a company is investing in web conferencing tools like Microsoft Teams and Zoom or implementing more flexible working models, employees in want of more flexibility and job security may need to look elsewhere.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Ad-Free, News-Focused Twitter Alternative Post Is Live

Post's innovative approach combines a new way for publishers to get paid with a better consumer news experience.

Post, a Twitter alternative in which users can make micropayments to read singular, ad and cookie-free news articles, has launched its public beta this week.

The new social media network is publisher-centric, with a keen focus on improving users’ news reading experiences.

The LA Times, USA Today, and The Independent have already signed up, along with a string of other local news, tech, and finance publications.

Post: A Better Way to Access Information?

Post’s unique selling point is the way it declutters the average person’s news reading process, providing an ad-free, paywall-free experience. You can read news directly within your feed on the site, rather than having to follow a link to reach externally hosted content. As this is the case, you’ll be able to read the news without accepting trackers and other ad tech-related permissions enforced by some major news corporations.

You won’t have to put up with any invasive cookie tracking when you read articles on Post – all reading is done within the app.

The catch is that you’re expected to make micropayments — denoted as “points” — which currently cost $4.20 for 300 points, according to Techcrunch’s Sarah Perez, who saw articles available for as little as a single point, but others worth up to 89 points.

Users currently get 50 free points when they sign up, and Post’s founder Noam Bardin says 80% of users have inputted credit card information to buy more. There are plans to add additional payment methods — such as paying whatever amount the user sees fit — in the near future.

On the surface at least, it would seem that setting up a platform in the way Post has will ensure that the average user reads more news that they actually care about from a wider variety of reputable sources. Having so much high-quality news hidden behind paywalls – accessible to only those who can afford it – is not ideal for any of us. Post, in theory, will at least lower that barrier.

What’s remarkable is how viable this could be for subscription-based publications struggling to persuade site visitors to sign up. If Post can keep the cost of points to a reasonable level, you can see it attracting a class of avid news readers who are open to the pay-as-you-go system.

Major Publications Are Already on Board

Over 650,000 people signed up for the Beta version of Post, and around two-thirds of that number ended up making an account, which is an encouraging sign.

TechCrunch reports that major news sites The Boston Globe, The Independent, Insider, LA Times, NBC News, Politico, Reuters, The San Francisco Chronicle, and USA Today all signed up to provide articles for the platform’s 430,000 account holders.

Websites that cover technology and finance, such as Fortune, MIT Technology Review, Yahoo Finance, and Wired, also have a presence on the platform.

Innovation in the Face of Twitter Turmoil

While Twitter continues to flounder under Elon Musk’s leadership, Twitter alternatives have been flourishing. A whole ecosystem of social media apps is now benefitting from Twitter’s deeply unsatisfied user base, a cohort of news-consuming users more open than ever to switching platforms.

Post also provides a fresh option for publishers like the New York Times, who’ve just been stripped of their “Verified” badges on Twitter because they don’t pay for it.

It’s not just Post who’ve shown promising signs of growing their user base, however. Mastodon, for instance, has more users than it’s ever had, while smaller platforms like CounterSocial have also seen an uptick in users.

If Twitter continues to make mass layoffs, respond to customer support requests with poo emojis, and deprioritize the overall user experience in favor of short-term profit-chasing initiatives, they’ll usher in the post-Twitter era all by themselves.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Here’s What Google, Meta and Co Have Cut to Save Costs

The world's most powerful tech companies have all cut costs already this year - but can anything stem the dire economic tide?

After overstretching during the pandemic while profits were booming, the world’s biggest tech companies have been brought resoundingly back down to earth by the financial hardships rapidly engulfing the global economy in 2023.

The likes of Meta and Amazon have resorted to making mass layoffs and giving up thousands of square feet of office space since the new year, while social media network Twitter has implemented some strange cost-cutting measures in recent times, including desperately pleading for reduced contractual terms with vendors.

Joining the doom and gloom this week, Google also announced cuts to employee services and perks will be taking place soon. So, we’ve had a closer look at how the Tech giant – as well as its rivals – are cutting costs this year.

Google: Staple Things Less, Please

One of Google’s objectives for 2023 is to “deliver durable savings through improved velocity and efficiency”, a recent internal email from company CFO Ruth Porat said. 

As part of this cost-cutting drive, a number of employee perks and services are going to be taken away, reports suggest. For instance, employees used to be able to expense a mobile phone even if there was one internally available – but now, this service is no longer possible.

Staff that would’ve been given MacBooks upon starting will now receive a Chromebook instead, with the more powerful devices reserved for engineering teams. Company cafes are set to close on quieter days such as Mondays and Fridays, while end-of-week yoga classes were identified as another “underutilized” perk at Google that could be scrapped.

“We set a high bar for industry-leading perks, benefits, and office amenities, and we will continue that into the future… however, some programs need to evolve for how Google works today” Ruth Porat, Google CFO.

Other measures include asking employees to share desks, while a facility directive for employees in San Francisco instructed that staplers and tape must now be drip-fed to employees by receptionists.  However, a Google spokesperson told CNBC that “staplers and tape continue to be provided to print stations. Any internal messages that claim otherwise are misinformed.″

These decisions are being implemented alongside the 12,000 layoffs that were announced back in January, representing 6% of Google’s workforce. 

Twitter: We Can’t Pay, but We Could Plead for Help

It’s a wonder why no other company has tried Twitter’s failsafe method of cutting costs that hit the headlines in December of last year: refusing to pay their rent

The Financial Times reports that Pablo Mendoza, a managing director at a Dubai-based investment firm that contributed $700m to Musk’s acquisition of the platform, has resorted to pleading with vendors that “his job is on the line”, negotiating 50 – 90% reductions in some cases.

In what seemed like an act of desperation, several items from Twitter’s offices were put up for auction in mid-January, including a pizza oven and the social media network’s famous bird statue.

These sorts of tactics already look like they’re backfiring, however, as the refusal to pay Twitter’s bills has wrapped the social network up in a multi-million dollar legal quagmire, with nine separate lawsuits looming.

To make matters worse, these ‘measures’ are being implemented against a backdrop of almost-constant layoffs, with three-quarters of the company’s pre-acquisition payroll no longer working for the company. Some were made redundant, while others were offered “voluntary separation” from Twitter.

Meta: Fewer Employees, Fewer Costs

At the beginning of February, Mark Zuckerberg announced that 2023 would be Meta’s “year of efficiency” – and he wasn’t wrong. 

In February, a cull of middle managers – referred to internally as the “flattening” – was initiated, with many told to move to an “individual contributor” role or leave the business. 

Then, Meta announced 10,000 layoffs in mid-March, taking the total number of employees made redundant in the last six months to over 21,000. 

Meta is also leaving vacant positions open instead of filling them – with recent reports suggesting that the company is leaving as many as five thousand positions unfilled to bring salary outgoings down.

Apple: Less Travel, More Pay Cuts

Apple has perhaps been the big tech company least affected by the economic downturn, largely due to its $165 billion worth of cash reserves, while Bloomberg says stock is up around 20% this year.

Despite this, the company has still implemented a number of cost-cutting measures, including delaying bonuses, pushing back projects like the HomePod to 2024, and reducing team budgets across the company.

Other tactics include limiting the ability of Apple’s workforce to transfer between locations, reducing employee travel, and simply leaving roles open when employees leave, as Meta has done.

Ever a man of the people, CEO Tim Cook requested that he take a pay cut himself this year, and plans to take home 40% less than he did in 2022 – leaving him with a mere $49 million.

Microsoft: So Long, Office Spaces

Like Apple, Microsoft has been restricting company gatherings and travel since the summer of 2022 – but the company is also going for the multi-pronged cost-cutting approach.

In January 2023, it was revealed that Microsoft was planning to let go of 1.7 million square feet of office space in an attempt to rein in costs and consolidate “to create higher density across our workspaces”.

Its biggest cost-cutting measure of 2023 so far, however, was laying off over 10,000 employees just after the new year, just days after offering staff unlimited paid time off

This itself could be a cost-cutting measure, as it helps companies avoid paying out for unspent holidays when staff members leave. 

Amazon: It’s the Little Things That Matter

Amazon has implemented a number of smaller cost-cutting measures over the past few months, with the need to save affecting almost every area of the business.

The company has already sublet and leased office space the company isn’t using, including 65,000 square feet in Bengaluru, India just this week.

A smaller measure has been to allow sellers to store their inventory in Amazon warehouses for longer periods of time.

The ecommerce behemoth also started giving third-party companies access to its logistics network in the name of quicker order fulfilment. Some Amazon Go stores in parts of the US, such as Seattle, have been closed too. 

Of course, the company’s wage budget will be significantly smaller – Amazon announced plans to lay off 18,000 employees in January 2023.

The Cost-Cutting Chaos Will Continue

Unfortunately for everyone working in the tech industry, this won’t be the last we hear of layoffs and other ruthless cost-cutting measures. More perks, pay, and physical office spaces are likely to be given up as the year trundles on.

Uncertain economic times provide new challenges for companies constantly in the spotlight, with heightened scrutiny over every dollar spent. Projects like Meta’s Metaverse, for instance, have been consistently framed as failures in recent weeks as the company flounders financially.

Which decision-makers and key players will come out unscathed remains to be seen – but Mark Zuckerberg and Amazon’s Andy Jassy have certainly seen their personal stock tank and employee unrest increase in the past few months.

Whatever happens, it’s unlikely restricting staplers and tape will be the most leftfield attempt to save a bit of cash we see in 2023.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Mullvad VPN’s New Browser Wants to Keep Your Data Private

The new browser has private mode enabled by default, and will block third-party trackers and cookies.

VPN company Mullvad is teaming up with the Tor Project to launch a new browser, called the Mullvad browser.

The goal and big selling point of the new software service is to help reduce a user’s online “fingerprint” as much as possible — in other words, to keep third-party services from collecting user data and tracking users across the internet with it.

Any new product with a focus on data security is welcome in 2023, when network breaches are more common than a case of the flu.

What Makes the Mullvad Browser More Private?

Here’s how the Tor Project explains the browser’s privacy settings:

“By default, Mullvad browser has private mode enabled, blocks third-party trackers and cookies, and makes it easy to delete cookies between visiting pages during the same session.”

On most mainstream browsers, tiny details about your online presence can be collection — stuff like your computer’s time zone, operating system, and browser version — and these details can allow companies to track your online activity across multiple websites. They can build a profile on you which can then be sold to advertisers.

The Mullvad browser also combats this practice, using a “hide-in-the-crowd” approach that makes each user’s fingerprint look the same as everyone else’s.

Here’s the Tor Project again to explain:

“The browser’s ‘out-of-the-box’ configurations and settings will mask many parameters and features commonly used to extract information from a person’s device that can make them identifiable, including fonts, rendered content, and several hardware APIs.”

Is Data Privacy Taking Off in 2023?

Hoovering up huge amounts of data with little to no justification has been the internet’s business model ever since Facebook first rose to power around the mid-2000s. But starting in 2018, when that social platform’s Cambridge Analytica scandal was disclosed, public opinion began to sour on social media and its data collection practices.

Today, you’d be hard-pressed to find someone who thinks social media is an unmitigated success, when while many of us rely on it to stay in touch with everyone we know. Between TikTok regulations and every Twitter news headline these days, it’s not clear that even the biggest social networks remain too big to fail.

In this mileu, it makes sense that many people might second-guess their social media use. And browsers are just as big a concern as social platforms. If you keep using Chrome, your data is still being used to deliver you ads.

If anyone wants to trim down on any data collected, privacy-centric browsers like Mullvad’s new solution are one great way to start. A quality paid VPN is another great way to stay private, too.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Germany Might Block ChatGPT Over Data Security Concerns

Italy officially blocked ChatGPT last Friday, saying the program potentially violated EU data protection rules.

Germany may be the next country in line to ban the ChatGPT AI program.

According to comments from the German commissioner for data protection, banning Microsoft’s popular OpenAI project is “possible.”

Italy has already banned the chatbot, citing data security concerns and a suspected breach of users’ data privacy. German’s decision may hinge on learning more about the reasoning behind the Italian regulator’s call.

ChatGPT has been praised for its ability to deliver articulate conversational responses on a wide range of topics. The AI tech has a lot of big potential business applications. But data privacy concerns are just the latest growing pain for the tech, which has also picked up a reputation for factual inaccuracies.

Why Did Italy Ban ChatGPT?

The Italian Data Protection Authority officially blocked ChatGPT last Friday, saying that the program was potentially violating European Union data protection rules.

The ban is temporary, but will last “until ChatGPT respects privacy,” and it’s unclear what will need to change in order to allow the chatbot to be restored. In response to the ban, OpenAI has disabled ChatGPT for Italian users while stating that it does not believe the program violates Europe’s privacy regulations.

Italy’s ban marks the first government-issued blockage of ChatGPT, or “the first nation-scale restriction of a mainstream AI platform by a democracy,” as Alp Toker, director of the advocacy group NetBlocks, told the Associated Press.

But it may not be the last. Just a few days later, other countries are already signaling a willingness to follow suit.

“In principle, such action is also possible in Germany,” Ulrich Kelber, the German commissioner for data protection, said in a statement about Italy’s ban. Kelber notes that states would have jurisdiction, and did not explain any further plans to ban the program.

France and Ireland regulators are also invested in learning more about Italy’s reasoning, and both say they have contacted the Italian data security watchdog for further discussion.

Will ChatGPT Bans Impact Me?

The application is now baked into some Microsoft features — it’s already powering a new tool called Microsoft Security Copilot that aims analyze cyberattacks — and will likely be used in many more services for Microsoft or third-party apps in the near future. But these effects probably won’t be impacted.

Any potential bans on ChatGPT aren’t likely to have ripple effects for those living in Italy or other countries beyond preventing them from accessing the online chatbot directly. Italy’s problem with the service appears to be focused on how the app registers new users and what it does with their personal data afterwards.

ChatGPT (and all its rival chatbots) can emerge relatively unscathed from the whole issue once it resolves the specific problems Italy has with it, but the affair is a great reminder for one concern: Any tech companies operating in Europe must constantly keep user data privacy concerns front and center.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

April Foul: Twitter Removes Your Free Verification from Today

If legacy users don't fork out for Twitter Blue, their experience on the app could change dramatically.

If you’re a legacy blue tick holder and you haven’t signed up for the platform’s premium service “Twitter Blue”, your verification will soon be removed, as Twitter begins “winding down the program”.

Despite their practical ability to discern legitimate accounts from impersonators, Elon Musk announced legacy blue checkmarks would be revoked back in December, claiming that their distribution was “corrupt and nonsensical”.

But this isn’t the only change coming to Twitter. From April 15, Twitter users will also need to be verified to vote in polls, and to appear on the platforms For You page. Here’s what we know so far.

Why You Could Lose Your Twitter Checkmark

It looks like the sun is finally setting on Twitter’s legacy verification system, which was first introduced just after the site was launched in 2009, as a way to identify legitimate accounts.

Since its rollout, the tick has come to represent a status symbol just as much as a tool for weeding out imposters. However, Twitter users still maintain that they’re a vital way for notable public figures to authenticate their identity on the app and that removing them could unleash some pretty serious security concerns.

But this isn’t the way that Elon Musk sees it. The second richest person in the world claims that switching the legacy system to the platform’s $8-a-month paid service is the “only realistic way to address advanced AI bot swarms taking over”.

While Musk claims that removing blue ticks for legacy users is the best way to keep users safe, forcing verified accounts to fork out for a monthly subscription is also a clear attempt to squeeze more cash from its user base.

Twitter’s financial turmoil is no secret. The social networking site has amassed an astronomical amount of debt since the SpaceX CEO acquired the site back in October. Musk has also been in hot water recently for failing to pay Twitter’s bills.

With arrears currently exceeding $14 million, and the company facing legal action from all sides, the promotion of Twitter Blue is hardly surprising. But aside from the dismantlement of legacy ticks, what other changes are coming to the platform?

What Other Changes Are Coming to Twitter?

From April 15, Twitter users will need to be verified to vote in polls, to prevent disruption from bots that are supposedly plaguing the platform.

Only companies, government entities, or Twitter Blue subscribers will be able to show up on the company’s ForYou page too — the app’s new algorithmically generated feed that takes heavy inspiration from the video app TikTok.

But while Musk claims these measures are the best way to protect its users from bots, a former member of Twitter’s verification doesn’t agree. “Our number one goal for my team was to protect users from real-world harm”, he told the BBC “and this screams the complete opposite to me.”

“Verified users will use their power and their presence on the platform to influence anything from misinformation to actual harm for users all around the world. It’s a silent threat that no one is seeing.”

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Meta Joins Big Tech’s U-Turn On Remote Work

Meta has stopped offering remote work in job listings, as part of an effort to improve its financial performance.

Despite being one of the first companies to let staff work from home during the pandemic, Meta has decided to stop offering remote work in new job postings, according to people familiar with the platform.

As the company carries out mass layoffs and reduces hiring in its “year of efficiency,” getting workers back into the office is understood to be another way to combat falling revenues.

But Meta’s actions aren’t taking place in isolation. It’s just the latest in a long line of major companies to repeal flexible measures, with Disney, Amazon, and Walmart rolling out return-to-office mandates this year.

Meta Stops Offering Remote Work to New Recruits

According to sources close to Meta, hiring managers in the company have been told to stop listing “remote” or “out of the office” working as options on new job listings.

While the social media giant’s official policy still allows employees to work from home whenever they please, this move suggests that the company might roll out stricter measures soon.

This news shouldn’t come as a surprise, though. Despite being an advocate of flexible working during the pandemic, Meta’s co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has gradually shifted his stance on remote work.

“Our hypothesis is that it is still easier to build trust in person and that those relationships help us work more effectively.” – Memo sent out by Meta

When Zuckerburg made the decision to axe another 10,00 workers earlier this month, he devoted a section of the layoff notice to the importance of “in-person time.” Here, he claimed that working in the office helps workers to form relationships that help them to work more effectively.

He also pointed to data that suggested that engineers who joined the company in-person performed better than those who joined remotely.

Meta lost $4.28 billion to its Reality Labs division last year, bringing its total losses for 2022 to an eye-watering $13.7 billion. As the company contends with falling ad revenues and mounting legal expenses, it’s no wonder it’s looking to recover losses. But Meta isn’t the only company rolling back remote working policies.

Is the Remote Working Experiment Drawing to a Close?

While one-minute commutes and decked-out home offices feel like the new normal for many of us, a number of major companies are starting to backtrack on their policies around remote work.

At the start of this year, Disney’s CEO Bob Iger ordered workers to return to the office four days a week, extending its three-day-a-week policy that’s been in place since 2021. Ecommerce behemoth Amazon dropped its WFH policy recently too, asking workers to come into the office at least three days a week starting on May 1st.

However, as the majority of US businesses remain connected through remote solutions like web conferencing software, flexible working isn’t going away any time soon. Most companies are moving forward with a hybrid solution, while some like Airbnb and Atlassian give their staff full autonomy about where they work.

Read our guide to companies offering remote work for an updated list of WFH-friendly workplaces.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

FTC Urged to Investigate OpenAI’s GPT for “Bias and Deception”

Experts are calling for a pause of AI developments, citing the risk tools like GPT-4 have on public safety.

An artificial intelligence (AI) ethics group has asked the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate OpenAIs GPT-4 technology, claiming that the powerful language model is “bias, deceptive, and a risk to privacy and public safety.”

Since OpenAIs chatbot first exploded onto the scene, it’s attracted over 100 million users, prompted copycat models by companies like Google and SnapChat, and sparked widespread fears around issues like job insecurity.

This formal complaint follows an open letter signed by Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and other notable figures in tech which pleads for AI development to be paused immediately. But do tools like GPT-4 really cause a threat to humanity?

Pressure is Being Put on the FTC to Halt OpenAI’s New Releases

The Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP) has just filed a complaint to the FTC, citing the potential dangers of GPT technology and calling for a temporary freeze on “large generative AI experiments” conducted by companies like OpenAI.

The complaint accuses OpenAI of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, which outlaws “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce”.

“The FTC has a clear responsibility to investigate and prohibit unfair and deceptive trade practices. We believe that the FTC should look closely at OpenAI and GPT-4.” – Marc Rotenberg, president of CAIDP

They also criticize the app for failing to meet the FTC’s standard of being “transparent, explainable, fair and empirically sound while fostering accountability.”

Major Names in Tech Sign Open Letter to Freeze AI Development

CAIDPs’ objection comes just a few days after the Future of Life released an open letter demanding for OpenAI and fellow AI researchers pause work for at least six months, to make space for discussions around its ethics.

“We call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.” – Open Letter from the Future of Life Institute 

The letter commented on the “out-of-control race to develop ever more powerful digital minds” that no one can “understand, predict, or reliably control”. It also outlined that if the pause couldn’t be enacted quickly, governments should step in to institute a moratorium.

This letter was signed by some of the leading names in tech, including the CEO of Twitter and co-founder of OpenAI, Elon Musk, and the co-founder of Apple, Steve Wozniak.

Musk’s U-turn against AI is, understandably, sparking concerns among its users. But did OpenAI and Musk really create Frankenstein’s monster? Or are anxieties around the smart technology overblown?

Is OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4 Really a Threat to Our Safety?

Earlier this month, OpenAI launched GPT-4 — an upgraded model that boasts a number of “human level” capabilities including image input and enhanced coding and translation.

As GPT technology advances at a rapid pace, the newer model offers even more opportunities to its users, including helping teachers create personalized learning experiences for students and programmers create mobile create apps with greater ease.

The benefits tools like GPT have on the business landscape have been well documented too, with the smart tool being used by a growing number of workers to automate a number of core processes from email production to keyword research.

However, as the technology spreads like wildfire, the tool has been accused multiple times of causing real-world harm – from issuing incorrect medical advice to doctors to helping cybercriminals launch successful phishing attacks.

Even OpenAI themselves admit that the chatbot can write “plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers” and that they are “a little bit scared” of the tool being used for nefarious purposes like large-scale disinformation campaigns and offensive cyberattacks.

Ultimately, the applications of tools like GPT depends on the user’s intent. But as we head further into unknown territory, pausing to reflect on its potential impact seems like a sensible move.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

The Next Industry AI Is Taking Over? Phishing Emails

AI chatbots like ChatGPT can improve spelling while creating longer and better phishing emails.

Generative artificial intelligence tools may already be helping scammers steal your data quicker, experts say.

Phishing emails work by impersonating an official email and tricking readers into clicking a link to malware or giving away their personal passwords.

And text-based AI chatbots like ChatGPT are built for impersonating people, making them incredibly useful time-saver for phishers who need a convincing email.

How AI Is Improving Phishing Email: Better Spelling, Longer Messages

Cybersecurity experts at the UK firm Darktrace say that “data suggests” an increasing number of phishing emails are written by AI bots.

The result is better grammar and spelling, as well as longer messages — essentially the removal of any giveaways that people could once rely on to signal they were reading a fake email. Automatic spam filters may also fail to spot these new types of spam email as well.

“Even if somebody said, ‘don’t worry about ChatGPT, it’s going to be commercialized,’ well, the genie is out of the bottle. What we think is having an immediate impact on the threat landscape is that this type of technology is being used for better and more scalable social engineering: AI allows you to craft very believable ‘spear-phishing’ emails and other written communication with very little effort, especially compared to what you have to do before.” –Max Heinemeyer, chief product officer at Darktrace

A new warning, issued from European agency Europol, relies on these findings from firms like Darktrace to highlight AI as a new threat in the world of phishing emails.

Interestingly, AI chatbots like ChatGPT come with safeguards aimed at preventing them from being used for criminal actions, but these can be overridden easily. Users simply talk to the chatbot as if it’s a person, convincing it to go against its own programming with a flimsy excuse: Cybersecurity firm Check Point says it was able to trick ChatGPT into generating a phishing email by telling the chatbot that it was creating the email template in order to help with an employee awareness program.

These emails are already a huge concern in the business world, too: The official term for phishing in a business context, “Business email compromise,” accounted for 19,954 complaints and a total lost value of $2.4 billion in 2021 alone.

Will AI Change the World?

We’ve talked about the power of AI technology for decades, and businesses have used machine learning algorithms for years. But recent advancements have brought new forms of text and image AI programs to mainstream audiences, and they’re better than ever.

In the end, AI is just a tool. It won’t make the world worse, but it can speed up the ways in which the world isn’t doing so great currently.

Businesses are already using them to do what businesses do under capitalism: Cut costs by replacing workers whenever possible. AI chatbots are already writing travel guides at Buzzfeed and helping code websites, among many other business uses. A recent report from Goldman Sachs predicts up to 300 million jobs, or 7% of jobs in the US, could be replaced with generative AI.

Hopefully, none of those 300 million people will fall for an AI-powered phishing email while job-seeking — that’s just salt on the wound.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Apple to ‘Wallop’ Competition with New Buy Now Pay Later Service

When a big tech firm enters a new market, it's safe to assume that competitors are going to have a bad day.

Apple has officially entered the “buy now, pay later” market with a new service that some analysts predict will “wallop” the competition.

There’s nothing worse for business than a big name entering your industry. Whether it be Amazon acquiring Whole Foods or Microsoft acquiring OpenAI, massive tech firms embarking on new markets can have a dire impact on small competitors.

That’s why “buy now, pay later” services are shuddering with the news that Apple has launched its own service in US this week.

Apple Announces BNPL Service

Apple announced on Tuesday that it would launch its own “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) solution. The new service would allow users to get small (between $50 and $1,000) loans for online and in-app purchases on Apple devices like iPhones and iPads.

“There’s no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to how people manage their finances. Many people are looking for flexible payment options, which is why we’re excited to provide our users with Apple Pay Later. It was designed with our users’ financial health in mind, so it has no fees and no interest, and can be used and managed within Wallet, making it easier for consumers to make informed and responsible borrowing decisions.” – Jennifer Bailey, vice president of Apple Pay and Apple Wallet.

The service will only work with merchants that accept Apple Pay, but considering 85% of US merchants do, that shouldn’t be too large a barrier to entry.

Random users are already being randomly selected to take part in the prerelease of the service, with all US users getting access soon.

Is Apple Poised to ‘Wallop’ Its BNPL Competition?

There’s always a bit of concern when a tech firm enters a new market, but it doesn’t always work out in favor of the big guys. Unfortunately, experts note that, in this case, Apple is likely going to run away with the gold on this one.

“Apple Pay Later will absolutely wallop some of the other players. Other companies would’ve taken a look at Apple’s announcement today because they are an ubiquitous name. This will take a bite out of the market share of other players.” – Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell.

Simply put, Apple already has such a robust infrastructure of hardware and software to support this kind of loan system. Combine that with the fact that Apple Pay is becoming increasingly popular across the US, and it’s safe to assume that Apple will quicky become the go-to option for buying now and paying later.


Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Musk, Wozniak Among Those Calling for AI Development Pause

"We call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4."

Not everyone is on board with the rapid development of AI tools like ChatGPT, with a number of high-profile tech professionals calling for a six-month pause to address significant concerns about the tech.

AI advancement has been moving at a clip for the last few months, with Microsoft’s $10 billion investment in OpenAI fueling the mad dash for artificial intelligence supremacy. The tech raises some serious concerns, though, considering studies have shown it could replace 80% of all jobs.

Fortunately, there are some sensible minds that are pushing back in the form of an open letter that calls for a temporary halt to AI advancement for the sake of humanity catching up.

Open Letter Calls for Halt to AI Advancement

An open letter from the Future of Life Institute is calling for a six-month pause on AI advancement, so that humanity can catch up and regulate it in a way that won’t have a long-term negative impact on the economy and life overall.

“Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable. This confidence must be well justified and increase with the magnitude of a system’s potential effects.” – open letter from Future of Life Institute

As for what kind of risks the technology poses, the writing is already on the wall. The Pope, for example, made headlines this week for wearing an outlandishly white puffy coat, sparking memes and discourse about the leader of the Catholic Church. The problem? That never happened and the image in question was a deepfake.

These kinds of mix-ups are only going to get more common, considering even Microsoft admits the technology can often be “usefully incorrect.” That kind of inaccuracy is fine when it comes to basic work tasks, but as the tech gets more popular, it will likely impact more meaningful work, and not necessarily in a positive way.

Who Has Signed the Open Letter to Halt AI Development?

While the call to pause AI development for six months alone is a newsworthy piece of information, some of the people that have signed the open letter lend some serious credibility to the request. Here are some of the big names that have signed the open letter:

  • Elon Musk – CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and Twitter
  • Steve Wozniak – Cofounder of Apple
  • Andrew Yang – 2020 Presidential Candidate
  • Jaan Tallinn – Cofounder of Skype
  • Evan Sharp – Cofounder of Pinterest

While Musk could potentially just be mad that a company is doing well without him, given his previous involvement with OpenAI, the other names on this list to the fact that this rapid AI development could, in fact, be a bit dangerous. Whether Microsoft and the other companies developing AI alternatives take note remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: The world is about to change because of AI, in one way or another.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Microsoft Adds ChatGPT-Powered Chatbot to Security Offerings

The new tool is called Microsoft Security Copilot and it will help cybersecurity professionals analyze cyberattacks better.

Is there anything ChatGPT can’t do? Microsoft has just announced that the AI-powered chatbot will soon be integrated into cybersecurity offerings from the Seattle-based tech giant.

The rollout of AI-powered technology over the last few months has been nothing if not meteoric. As soon as Microsoft acquired OpenAI and the ChatGPT software that came with it, the tech industry erupted in a battle for AI supremacy that has led to a wide range of AI alternatives.

The original still maintains its spot at the top, though, with Microsoft and OpenAI combining for a bevy of new functionalities that could make business easier for every single person at your company.

Microsoft Launches ‘Security Copilot’

Announced in a company blog post on Tuesday, Microsoft is launching a ChatGPT-powered chatbot for cybersecurity professionals that can help in the understanding and analysis of cyberattacks against businesses.

The tool, dubbed “Microsoft Security Copilot,” integrates with Microsoft security products as an automated helper to guide you through complexities of cybersecurity.

“This is really a better together story. Security Copilot is not only an OpenAI large language model, but rather it contains a network effect, enabling organizations to truly defend at machine speed.” – Charlie Bell, executive vice president for security, compliance, identity and management at Microsoft

Considering the significant rise in security breaches and data leaks over the last few years, a bit of help from AI is likely a much-appreciated boon for cybersecurity professionals. Still, is all this AI-powered functionality rolling out a bit too fast?

The Meteoric Rise of AI

ChatGPT gained popularity only a few short months ago, but the impact it has had on the business world has been staggering. Microsoft’s $10 billion investment in OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, alone was enough to change the tide of the machine learning economy for businesses and employees alike.

Still, ChatGPT and the rest of the AI-powered business tools are far from perfect, which even Microsoft will admit.

“Security Copilot doesn’t always get everything right. AI-generated content can contain mistakes.” – Vasu Jakkal, corporate vice president of security, compliance, identity, and management at Microsoft

Regardless of its imperfect nature right now, the future of AI-powered tools like this is bright, and as you can likely tell from the gold rush on finding alternatives, quite lucrative.

Because these tools can be used for everything from coding to content creation at break-neck speeds, they’ve been increasingly attractive to virtually every business in the world. But does this kind of technology require a bit more regulation to avoid any of the potential downfalls?

Considering ChatGPT and similar AI-powered tools are projected to replace up to 80% of all jobs, it’s safe to say that something needs to be addressed before it’s too late. Some tech pioneers are suggesting a six-month pause on progress, just so regulators can catch up to the quick development of the tech. Still, in an industry known to “move fast and break things,” we aren’t holding our breath.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Zoom’s AI Features Include Meeting Recaps and Suggested Actions

Even if you miss your next Zoom call, you can still keep up thanks to new AI features being added to Zoom IQ.

Web conferencing platform Zoom has added new AI features, intended to save participants time and ensure they don’t miss any vital details.

The new additions to Zoom IQ will allow users to automatically catch up with missed meetings, create whiteboards and even suggest actions for meeting participants to take.

Zoom is the latest company to add AI features, and the explosion shows no signs of slowing down, with the likes of Microsoft and Google betting big on the emerging tech.

New AI Additions to Zoom IQ

Zoom IQ isn’t a new feature – the company has actually been slowing adding AI to the service for the past year. This includes using AI to analyze customer interactions, and smart meeting recording.

Now, Zoom has added even more AI-backed functions to its web conferencing platform, all designed to save time and make the collaborative process easier. If an attendee is late for a meeting, for example, or misses it entirely, they can use Zoom IQ to generate a summary of the main points of the meeting.

Whiteboards can also be created from prompts that may occur during the meeting, and come pre-populated with potential ideas. At the end of the meeting, a meeting recap will be generated, with suggested actions for participants to take next.

The new feature can also be used to generate messages to clients, based on the the context provided by the notes made. Here, users can decide if they want to write a short, medium or long message, as well as what sort of tone they’d like to opt for – be it friendly, formal, or, if you have a particularly good rapport with your client, sarcastic (probably don’t use that one).

Zoom Competitors Using AI

There’s no doubt that we’ll see a lot more AI in our work platforms from now on, and Zoom’s competitors aren’t slouching here. Last year, Google introduced some AI features to Meet, which included intelligent image quality improvements, and live transcripts of meeting notes. Like Zoom’s IQ, Meet can also summarize meetings for attendees who weren’t there (or just those that don’t want to have to physically take notes).

As you might expect from the company with a $10 billion investment in OpenAI, Microsoft is currently putting as much AI into its platforms as it possibly can, and Microsoft Teams is no exception. You’ll need to cough up for the premium Teams package to get this kind of functionality, but if you do, you can expect ‘intelligent recap’, which is similar to what Google and Zoom offer – automatically generated meeting notes with suggested actions.

In addition, Teams offers personalized time markers, which will note when you entered or left a meeting, and let you quickly replay the parts you missed.

Teams also includes AI-generated translations for 40 spoken languages. While this feature is Premium specific, only the meeting host needs to have the premium version of Teams for translations to be accessible to attendees.

The rise of collaboration platforms has been meteoric in the last three years, thanks to the pandemic, but with the application of AI, we’re likely to see an unprecedented arms race between providers as they attempt to woo us with time-saving tech.

 

 

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

45% of Workers “Too Busy” to Seek Help for Mental Health

A recent survey found that a further 25% were "too embarrassed" to do the same, while 22% said they can't afford it.

A new survey of hundreds of HR professionals and full-time employees has found that while nearly two-thirds of workers are struggling with their physical and mental health, 45% say they’re “too busy” or “too embarrassed” to seek care.

Worryingly, even though the vast majority of employees report that their health has stayed the same or worsened in the past year, most HR leaders and decision-makers reported that their workforce’s health had improved.

The results are a reminder for businesses to ensure that their staff members feel able to take mental health sick days when they need to, and that everyone is set up with video conferencing, as well as other remote-working essentials, so they’re able to work from where they feel the most comfortable.

Employee Well-Being: A Bleak Picture

Health and well-being company One Medical has surveyed 800 HR and employee benefits leaders and 800 employees working full time in the United States, with the help of data analytics and research firm Workplace Intelligence.

They found that 64% of employees are struggling with mental and behavioral health. 78% said they’d struggled for over a year with their issue/s, whereas 48% have had trouble dating back to over three years.

78% of surveyed employees said they’d struggled for over a year with mental health issues. 91% reported this affecting their productivity; 45% claim it affects over 5 working hours a week

The overwhelming majority of survey respondents – 91% – reported that they’re less productive when under intense mental or physical stress, and 45% said that this affects more than 5 hours of their work per week.

Workers Too Busy, Too Embarrassed

One Medical’s survey also found that despite 84% of employees using their healthcare benefits during 2022, “they aren’t making the most of them.”

Less than a fifth of poll respondents confirmed that they’d sought help for mental health issues, while only 37% used their health benefits plan to receive preventive support.

Concerningly, when respondents were asked why they weren’t seeking help, 45% said they were too busy, while a further 25% said they were too embarrassed. 22%, on the other hand, said the care they required was too pricey.

However, the data suggests that the communication issue seems to go both ways. 28% of staff said they don’t receive any general health advice from their employer, and 17% said that they don’t receive any information about healthcare benefits offered by their company.

Employee Struggles Not Relayed Upwards

Although 75% of employees surveyed reported that their mental health had worsened or stayed the same throughout 2022, 60% HR leaders thought their workforce’s mental health had improved during that twelve-month period, while 59% came to a similar conclusion about their physical health.

One Medical says that this “indicates that leaders may not appreciate the extent to which their team members may be struggling with their health”.

If a significant proportion of workers feel too busy and too embarrassed to even seek help in the first place, then this might explain why colleagues higher up the food chain have an inaccurate picture of precisely how much their counterparts are struggling.

Putting Employees First

One Medical’s survey results, although concerning, did provide some promising findings too. For instance, 45% of HR leaders said that “improving awareness and communication around their benefits is one of their top strategic priorities for 2023”.

You can provide as many formal benefits as you like, but important as they are, it will all be in vain if you fail to create an environment within which employees feel comfortable requesting the support they need to put their mental health first.

Ensuring employees have manageable workloads  – and that there’s a fair process for adjusting them when necessary – will go some way to absolving the guilt or pressure some people feel to work beyond their means.

As mentioned earlier on, making sure your employees have the resources they need to work from home, such as video conferencing equipment, as well as giving them the flexibility to do so, will go a long way to alleviating stress levels on a day-to-day basis.

For businesses and staff alike, the post-pandemic era has been disorientating. Building trust through prioritizing the mental well-being of your workforce, however, is one way to create stability you can sustain.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Microsoft: Stop Using Bing Data to Make Your Own AI Chatbots

The company has threatened to restrict its rivals from using Bing search data if it keeps being used for other AI projects.

Microsoft has warned competitors against using its licensed search engine data to create AI chatbots of their own, and has threatened to restrict access to its informational assets should businesses not comply.

The tech giant, which has a long-term partnership with ChatGPT creators OpenAI, and has incorporated the technology into Bing, has confidentially notified two companies that use Bing search engine data that they’ve violated the terms of their agreement with Microsoft.

The news illustrates that the race to create a true ChatGPT alternative is becoming so competitive that companies are willing to risk legal trouble with one of the world’s largest tech companies just so they can build their own.

Microsoft Enforces Search Data Deal Terms

For years, Microsoft has licensed the data that fuels its search index engine to other companies that provide similar search tools, including privacy-focused DuckDuckGo and Yahoo. You.com and Neeva also use Bing’s data to serve relevant searches to users.

However, against a backdrop of new AI use cases for businesses and individuals popping up all the time, a number of these entities have incorporated AI tools and features into their search engines.

Creating useful artificial intelligence is no small feat, which goes some way to explain why companies are feeding Bing’s data to their chatbots, rather than going through the arduous process of collecting their own.

“We’ve been in touch with partners who are out of compliance as we continue to consistently enforce our terms across the board,” Microsoft revealed in a recent statement.

“We’ll continue to work with them directly and provide any information needed to find a path forward,” the company adds.

As the dispute is confidential, the specific partners involved in the above discussions have not been publicly named. Microsoft has previously signaled support for businesses that want to create their own AI tools and chatbots, but this is very different from competing search engines.

The Race to Catch up to ChatGPT

The explosion of AI projects – most notably chatbots – since ChatGPT was released at the tail-end of last year, has been nothing short of extraordinary.

You can sign up to trial Google’s Bard AI platform today, which functions in roughly the same way that ChatGPT does, despite being trained on different linguistic data.

Chinese search engine Baidu, on the other hand, recently launched Ernie bot, although it looks like it’ll be some time before it becomes a true ChatGPT competitor, not least due to China’s hardline censorship laws.

As well as these large-scale projects, there’s a whole world of ChatGPT alternatives now available, produced by all sorts of companies, including small startups. Resources like OpenAI Playground — which is a great option if you’d like to use ChatGPT and you find it’s at capacity — are also available to the public. With the competition well and truly hotting up, we’d suggest keeping your ear to the ground.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Twitter Presses GitHub to Reveal Who Leaked Its Source Code

The data has now been removed from GitHub, but the social media giant wants to know how the culprit obtained it.

Court filings have revealed that Twitter’s source code was recently leaked online — and that the social media platform is now on the hunt for the person responsible, after subpoenaing GitHub for more information.

CEO Elon Musk claimed earlier this month that he has plans to release parts of Twitter’s source code anyway, but only aspects that relate to the algorithm determining which users’ tweets are recommended. This leak was not what he had in mind.

After months of layoffs, missed office rents and advertisers jumping ship, Twitter’s monetary value has plummeted dramatically – and that’s according to Musk.

Twitter Source Code Leaked

Last week, it was revealed in filings to the U.S. District Court that Twitter has been legally pressuring Microsoft-owned coding repository GitHub to provide information on a user that leaked the company’s copyrighted source code on their site.

Twitter’s lawyers demanded that GitHub “identify the alleged infringer or infringers”, and remove Twitter’s code from its site. The source code was taken down. There’s little additional public information about the proceedings available.

“GitHub does not generally comment on decisions to remove content,” a spokesperson for the platform told the BBC.

“However, in the interest of transparency, we share every DMCA [Digital Millennium Copyright Act] takedown request publicly,” they added.

The account name of the leaker – “FreeSpeechEnthusiast” – does feel like a not-so-veiled reference to Elon Musk’s self-professed absolutism when it comes to first amendment rights and internet censorship.

Let Me Leak My Own “Embarrassing” Source Code

Elon Musk has previously suggested that he will reveal parts of Twitter’s source code that are used to construct the algorithm that recommends Tweets, in the name of improving a part of the platform that is “not fully understood internally”.

“Providing code transparency will be incredibly embarrassing at first, but it should lead to rapid improvement in recommendation quality. Most importantly, we hope to earn your trust” Musk said in a March 17 tweet.

At present, it is unclear whether this is part of the source code contained in the GitHub leak.

Twitter in Tatters?

The leaking of Twitter’s source code is the latest installment of a seemingly never-ending saga of chaos that has left the company hamstrung by controversy, since takeover talks began in 2022.

According to the social media platform’s billionaire owner, who also founded Tesla and SpaceX, the site is now only worth around $20 billion, less than half of the $44 billion fee Musk paid for it back in October of last year.

Around half of Twitter’s top 1,000 advertisers have now halted operations on the platform, and four of the top 10 biggest spenders have backed off, data from digital marketing firm Pathmatics suggests.

Whether Twitter can convince advertisers to come back and resume spending remains to be seen.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

Apple Threatens to Discipline Staff Who Won’t Return to Office

Employee attendance is being tracked, with threats of escalating warnings for those that don't comply.

The return-to-office movement is heating up, with Apple reportedly threatening action against employees that are refusing to embrace their new commute.

After the remote work honeymoon of the early pandemic, tech companies got antsy and wanted their employees back in the office, despite higher productivity numbers and notable improvements to mental well-being.

Apple has been at the forefront of this movement, battling with employees on a regular basis about returning to the office.

Apple Warns of Firings for Employees That Don’t Return to Office

According to tweets from a source familiar with the matter, Apple has been taking some stern steps towards getting employees back in the office, including tracking attendance with dedicated software and giving out “escalating warnings” to employees that don’t adhere.

And yes, there have been rumors that they will take it even further if these employees hold strong in their remote work commitment.

“At Apple, some orgs are saying failure to comply could result in termination, but that doesn’t appear to be a company-wide policy.” – Zoë Schiffer, managing editor at Platformer.

The report signals growing turbulence at the tech firm, as employees continue to make noise about the Apple’s return to office policy.

Apple’s Return-to-Office Woes

Despite Apple being one of the few tech companies that haven’t made layoffs in recent months, employees still aren’t feeling great about the company, as the return-to-work policy continues to divide management from the staff. One group of employees even banded together to create Apple Together, something of a union in service of helping leadership understand staff demands.

When hybrid work policy went into effect on September 5th last year, CEO Tim Cook explained in a memo that he knows it will be a polarizing time for employees.

“For many of you, I know that returning to the office represents a long-awaited milestone and a positive sign that we can engage more fully with the colleagues who play such an important role in our lives. For others, it may also be an unsettling change. I want you to know that we are deeply committed to giving you the support and flexibility that you need in this next phase.” – Tim Cook, Apple CEO

Whether the desire to get employees back in the office is an actual push towards productivity or just a way to keep the corporate real estate market from crashing is neither here nor there. Tech firms like Apple have drawn a line in the sand in regard to their expectations, and news like this shows that they aren’t messing around when it comes to enforcing these policies.

Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.

FTC Plans to Crack Down on Hard-to-Cancel Subscriptions

A new provision would force companies to make cancelling subscriptions as easy as signing up.

Cancelling a subscription could soon be as easy as signing up for one, with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announcing plans to pursue a formal ban on hard-to-cancel services.

If you’ve ever overstayed a free trial or tried to cancel a gym membership, you know that companies are more than happy to make signing up as easy as possible, while throwing up obstacles to cancel, despite how unpopular it is with customers.

That practice may not be around for much longer, though, thanks to a push for new rules by the FTC.

FTC Proposed Click-to-Cancel Rules for Subscriptions

Announced in a press release from the FTC, the government agency proposed a “click to cancel” provision that would require “sellers to make it as easy for consumers to cancel their enrollment as it was to sign up.”

“Companies should not be able to manipulate consumers into paying for subscriptions that they don’t want. We get countless complaints about this.” – FTC chair Lina Khan

For starters, the provision would require businesses to create a “simple cancellation mechanism,” so users could unsubscribe from services in a timely manner. On top of that, the provision would force companies to send out annual reminders that users are subscribed to a service to keep them aware of their spending.

Finally, the FTC is proposing that providers will still be allowed to offer special deals and discounts when a user opts to cancel, but that they must first ask if the user wants to see them.

Does Click-to-Cancel Help Businesses?

If you don’t think about it for too long, making it hard to cancel a subscription might seem like a good idea. After all, if it’s harder to cancel, maybe they’ll just stay customers for longer, right?

If you did think about it for a bit longer, though, you’d realize that there’s a lot more to acquiring and retaining customers than just keeping them subscribed against their will. In fact, 68% of customers decide to leave a business due to perceived indifference towards them, and a hard-to-cancel subscription will do exactly that.

The reality is that a successful business isn’t going to be one that traps customers in subscriptions they don’t want. If you really want to keep your numbers up, focusing on improving productivity is a much nobler goal than tricking your loyal audience.


Written by:
Conor is the Lead Writer for Tech.co. For the last eight years, he’s covered everything from tech news and product reviews to digital marketing trends and business tech innovations. He's a feature, reviews, and news contributor for Android Police, and he has hosted tech-focused events for SXSW, Tech in Motion, and General Assembly, to name a few. He also cannot pronounce the word "colloquially" correctly. You can email Conor at conor@tech.co.
Back to top